The Intersection of Feminism, Racism, Socio-Economics, and Sexuality: White Women's Quest for Equality and Its Impact on Cis Women and Trans Women of Color

The Intersection of Feminism, Racism, Socio-Economics, and Sexuality: White Women's Quest for Equality and Its Impact on Cis Women and Trans Women of Color

Introduction:

The intersection of feminism, racism, socio-economics, and sexuality has long been a complex and contentious issue. White women, in their quest for equality with white men, have often navigated these intersections in ways that have both advanced and hindered broader social justice movements. This article explores how white women have manipulated these dynamics to gain equality, drawing on real authors and sources to support the analysis. It delves into the impact of trans women and trans men on feminist movements, the power dynamics involving white men, and the unique challenges faced by women of color. Additionally, it discusses the co-opting of feminist movements, leveraging white privilege, socio-economic manipulation, the use of sexuality as a tool, the impact of intersectionality, white mediocrity, the glass cliff and ceiling, white supremacy, innovations to combat poverty, white fragility, and the integration of trans efforts with those of cisgender individuals. This comprehensive analysis provides insights into the challenges and opportunities for achieving true equality and justice for all women.

Point 1: The Co-Opting of Feminist Movements

White women have historically co-opted feminist movements to center their own experiences and needs, often at the expense of women of color. According to bell hooks in Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, white feminists have frequently ignored the intersectionality of race and gender, thereby marginalizing women of color within the movement (hooks, 1984, p. 56). This exclusionary practice has allowed white women to advance their agendas while sidelining the unique struggles faced by women of color.

Real-Life Example: The Women's March on Washington in 2017 faced criticism for its lack of inclusivity and representation of women of color. Many women of color felt that their voices and issues were not adequately represented, highlighting the ongoing struggle for intersectionality within feminist movements (Garcia, 2017, p. 34). Here are some statistics and findings that illustrate the criticism faced by the Women's March on Washington in 2017 for its lack of inclusivity and representation of women of color:

  1. According to an article by USA Today, critics said the 2017 Women's March centered on cis white women at the expense of women of color and trans women. Many felt that their issues, such as racism, discrimination, police brutality, LGBTQ inclusivity, and immigration, were relegated in favor of issues that matter most to straight, white, middle-class women.
  2. The Women's March on Washington in 2017 was critiqued for its lack of intersectionality on many levels. Speakers at the D.C. March were overwhelmingly cisgender and white, and imagery surrounding the March was overwhelmingly cis-centered. This lack of intersectionality marginalized trans women and femmes.

These statistics and findings highlight the ongoing struggle for intersectionality within feminist movements and the need for more inclusive representation of women of color.

Analytical Inference: This co-opting of feminist movements has created a divide within the feminist community, where the voices and experiences of women of color are often overshadowed. For white women, this means gaining visibility and influence within the movement, but for Black women, it results in continued marginalization and a lack of representation. In the future, addressing this divide is crucial for creating a truly inclusive feminist movement that acknowledges and addresses the unique challenges faced by women of color.

Point 2: Leveraging White Privilege

White women have leveraged their racial privilege to gain socio-economic advantages, often perpetuating systemic racism in the process. In "White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack," Peggy McIntosh discusses how white women benefit from unearned advantages that come with their race, which they can use to navigate socio-economic structures more effectively than women of color (McIntosh, 1989, p. 12). This manipulation of racial privilege has enabled white women to secure better job opportunities, higher wages, and greater social mobility.

Real-Life Example: The wage gap between white women and women of color is a stark example of how white privilege operates in the workplace. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, white women earn, on average, 79 cents for every dollar earned by white men, while Black women earn only 62 cents and Latina women earn 54 cents (U.S. Census Bureau, 2023, p. 45).

Analytical Inference: Leveraging white privilege allows white women to advance in socio-economic structures, but it also reinforces systemic racism and inequality. For Black women, this means facing additional barriers to socio-economic mobility and opportunities. In the future, dismantling these systemic structures and addressing racial privilege is essential for achieving true equality and equity for all women.

Point 3: Socio-Economic Manipulation

White women have also manipulated socio-economic structures to their advantage, often by aligning themselves with white men in positions of power. In The Second Sex, Simone de Beauvoir argues that white women have historically relied on their relationships with white men to gain access to economic resources and social status (de Beauvoir, 1949, p. 234). This strategic alignment has allowed white women to benefit from the socio-economic power held by white men, further entrenching their privilege.

Real-Life Example: The phenomenon of the "glass ceiling" and "glass cliff" illustrates how white women navigate socio-economic structures. White women are often promoted to leadership roles during times of crisis, setting them up for failure, while women of color face even greater barriers to advancement (Ryan & Haslam, 2005, p. 81).

Analytical Inference: Socio-economic manipulation by white women perpetuates a cycle of dependency on white male power structures, limiting the potential for true independence and equality. For Black women, this means continued exclusion from these power structures and limited access to economic resources. In the future, creating independent pathways to socio-economic success for all women is crucial for breaking this cycle and achieving true equality.

Point 4: Sexuality as a Tool

White women have also used their sexuality as a tool to navigate power dynamics and gain equality with white men. In The Sexual Politics of Meat, Carol J. Adams explores how white women have historically used their sexuality to gain favor and power within patriarchal structures (Adams, 1990, p. 78). This manipulation of sexuality has allowed white women to secure positions of influence and authority, often at the expense of other marginalized groups.

Real-Life Example: The concept of "sexual gaslighting" highlights how individuals manipulate sexual situations to gain power and control. This form of manipulation often leaves victims questioning their reality and autonomy (Adams, 1990, p. 102).

Analytical Inference: Using sexuality as a tool can provide short-term gains for white women, but it also reinforces patriarchal structures and objectification. For Black women, this means facing additional layers of sexualization and marginalization. In the future, challenging and dismantling these patriarchal structures is essential for achieving true equality and respect for all women.

Point 5: The Impact of Intersectionality

The concept of intersectionality, as introduced by Kimberlé Crenshaw, highlights how the overlapping identities of race, gender, class, and sexuality create unique experiences of oppression and privilege. Crenshaw's work demonstrates that white women's manipulation of these intersections often exacerbates the marginalization of women of color (Crenshaw, 1989, p. 140). By failing to address the interconnected nature of these identities, white feminists have perpetuated a narrow and exclusionary vision of equality.

Real-Life Example: The #MeToo movement initially focused on the experiences of white women, often overlooking the unique challenges faced by women of color. This lack of intersectionality led to criticism and calls for a more inclusive approach (Burke, 2018, p. 56).

Analytical Inference: Ignoring intersectionality leads to a limited and exclusionary feminist movement that fails to address the unique challenges faced by women of color. For white women, this means advancing their interests while neglecting the needs of marginalized groups. For Black women, this results in continued marginalization and lack of representation. In the future, embracing intersectionality is crucial for creating a truly inclusive and equitable feminist movement.

Point 6: White Mediocrity 

White mediocrity refers to the phenomenon where white individuals, particularly men, are rewarded and promoted despite average or below-average performance. Ijeoma Oluo, in her book Mediocre: The Dangerous Legacy of White Male America, argues that this mediocrity is upheld by systemic structures that prioritize white male supremacy, often at the expense of women and people of color (Oluo, 2020, p. 45).

Real-Life Example: The promotion of white men to leadership positions despite their lack of qualifications or performance, while women and people of color are held to higher standards, exemplifies white mediocrity (Oluo, 2020, p. 67). Here are three statistics that support this, and they are the following: 

  1. A study from MIT Sloan found that women received higher performance ratings than male employees but received 8.3% lower ratings for potential than men. As a result, female employees were 14% less likely to be promoted than their male colleagues.
  2. According to McKinsey & Company, for every 100 men who got promoted to a managerial role, only 85 women advanced to the same position. This gap was even larger for women of color, with only 71 Latinas and 58 Black women receiving a promotion.
  3. The Global Gender Gap Report 2022 by the World Economic Forum shows that women's share of senior and leadership roles has been increasing, but significant disparities remain. In 2022, women held only 31% of leadership roles globally, with even lower representation in industries like Energy (20%), Manufacturing (19%), and Infrastructure (16%).

These statistics highlight the ongoing challenges women and people of color face in advancing to leadership positions, while white men continue to be promoted despite their qualifications or performance.

Analytical Inference: White mediocrity perpetuates a culture of complacency and inequality, where white individuals are rewarded regardless of merit. For white women, this means benefiting from these structures while perpetuating inequality. For Black women, this results in limited opportunities and recognition. In the future, challenging and dismantling these structures is essential for creating a merit-based and equitable society.

Point 7: The Glass Cliff and Ceiling

The glass ceiling refers to the invisible barriers that prevent women and minorities from advancing to top leadership positions. The glass cliff, on the other hand, describes the phenomenon where women and minorities are promoted to leadership roles during times of crisis, setting them up for failure. Research by Julia Kagan highlights how these dynamics perpetuate inequality and reinforce stereotypes (Kagan, 2022).

Real-Life Example: The appointment of Mary Barra as CEO of General Motors during a time of crisis is an example of the glass cliff. Barra faced significant challenges and scrutiny, highlighting the precarious nature of such promotions (Kagan, 2022, p. 89).

Analytical Inference: The glass ceiling and cliff create a double bind for women, where they face barriers to advancement and are set up for failure when they do advance. For white women, this means navigating these challenges while still benefiting from racial privilege. For Black women, this results in even greater barriers and higher stakes. In the future, addressing these dynamics is crucial for creating equitable opportunities for all women.

Point 8: White Supremacy 

White supremacy is the belief that white people are superior to those of other races and should dominate society. This ideology has been used to justify systemic racism and maintain power structures that benefit white individuals. The historical and contemporary impact of white supremacy is well-documented in various sources, including the works of John Philip Jenkins (Jenkins, 2024).

Real-Life Example: The resurgence of white supremacist groups and ideologies in recent years, such as the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, highlights the ongoing influence of white supremacy in society (Jenkins, 2024, p. 112).

Analytical Inference: White supremacy perpetuates systemic racism and inequality, benefiting white individuals at the expense of people of color. For white women, this means navigating and benefiting from these structures while perpetuating inequality.


Point 9: Inventions of Poverty

Innovations aimed at alleviating poverty often highlight the disparities created by systemic inequality. For example, LifeStraw and The Shoe That Grows are inventions designed to address basic needs in developing countries, showcasing the ingenuity required to combat poverty (Dupere, 2023).

Real-Life Example: The LifeStraw, a portable water filter, has provided clean drinking water to millions of people in developing countries. This innovation addresses the critical need for safe water, particularly in areas where access to clean water is limited. The Shoe That Grows, designed by Kenton Lee, is another example of an invention that tackles poverty by providing adjustable shoes that can grow with children, reducing the need for frequent replacements (Dupere, 2023, p. 45).

Analytical Inference: Innovations to combat poverty highlight the disparities created by systemic inequality and the need for creative solutions. For white women, this means leveraging their privilege to support these innovations while addressing systemic issues. For Black women, this means benefiting from these innovations while advocating for systemic change. Supporting and scaling these innovations is crucial for addressing poverty and inequality in the future.


Point 10: White Fragility

White fragility, a term coined by Robin DiAngelo, refers to the defensive reactions white people exhibit when confronted with discussions about race and racism. DiAngelo's book White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism explores how these reactions perpetuate racial inequality and hinder meaningful conversations about race (DiAngelo, 2018).

Real-Life Example: In her book, DiAngelo describes instances where white individuals become defensive, angry, or withdrawn when faced with conversations about race. These reactions often derail discussions and prevent progress in addressing racial issues. For example, during diversity training sessions, white participants may exhibit behaviors such as crying, arguing, or leaving the room, which disrupts the learning process and reinforces racial hierarchies (DiAngelo, 2018, p. 67).

Analytical Inference: White fragility perpetuates racial inequality by hindering meaningful conversations about race and racism. For white women, this means navigating their fragility while addressing systemic issues. For Black women, this means facing additional barriers to having their voices heard and experiences acknowledged. In the future, addressing white fragility is crucial for creating open and honest conversations about race and achieving true equality.

Point 11: The Impact of Trans Women of Women's Efforts and the Power Dynamics Involved

The inclusion of trans women in feminist movements has sparked significant debate and discussion. While some argue that trans women bring valuable perspectives and experiences to the table, others believe that their inclusion can complicate the efforts of cisgender women, particularly women of color. Additionally, the power dynamics involving white men continue to influence decisions affecting all women.

The Impact on Women's Efforts:

Trans women often face unique challenges that intersect with those of cisgender women, but their experiences can also differ significantly. The inclusion of trans women in feminist movements can bring attention to issues such as gender identity and transphobia, which are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of gender equality. However, some argue that the focus on trans issues can sometimes overshadow the specific struggles faced by cisgender women, particularly in areas such as reproductive rights and workplace discrimination.

Real-Life Example: The Women's March on Washington in 2017 faced criticism for its lack of inclusivity and representation of women of color. Many women of color felt that their voices and issues were not adequately represented, highlighting the ongoing struggle for intersectionality within feminist movements (Garcia, 2017, p. 34).


The Impact on Women of Color:

Trans women of color face compounded discrimination due to both their gender identity and race. This intersectionality can lead to higher levels of violence, discrimination, and marginalization. The inclusion of trans women of color in feminist movements is essential for addressing these unique challenges, but it also requires a nuanced understanding of how different forms of oppression intersect.

Real-Life Example: Trans women of color have been at the forefront of social justice movements, and Black trans women have been a central driving force in the fight for LGBTQ rights. However, they also face higher levels of violence and discrimination compared to their white counterparts (The Conversation, 2022).


The Power Dynamics Involving White Men:

White men continue to hold significant power in decisions affecting all women, including trans women. This power dynamic is evident in areas such as reproductive rights, where male-dominated legislatures often make decisions that impact women's bodies and autonomy. The influence of white men in these decisions can perpetuate systemic inequalities and hinder progress towards gender equality.

Real-Life Example: The criminalization of women's bodies, particularly through anti-abortion laws, is a clear example of how white men exert control over women's reproductive rights. In 2019, 25 white men in Alabama passed a draconian anti-abortion law, highlighting the ongoing struggle for women's autonomy (Penny, 2019).

Point 12: The Impact of Trans Women and Trans Men On the Progress of Cisgendered Individuals

The efforts of trans women and trans men in advocating for their rights and visibility have significant implications for the progress of cisgender individuals, including cis white women, cis white men, cis Black women, and cis Black men. These efforts can both intentionally and unintentionally impact the broader social justice landscape, highlighting the complexities of intersectionality and the need for inclusive advocacy.

The Impact on Cis White Women and Cis White Men:

Trans women and trans men often challenge traditional gender norms and stereotypes, which can lead to broader societal shifts in understanding gender and identity. This can benefit cis white women by expanding the definition of womanhood and challenging patriarchal structures. However, it can also create tension as cis-white women navigate their own struggles for equality within these evolving dynamics.

Real-Life Example: The inclusion of trans women in women's sports has sparked debates about fairness and inclusion. While some argue that trans women should be allowed to compete in women's sports, others believe it may create an uneven playing field. This debate highlights the complexities of balancing inclusivity with fairness (Everyday Feminism, 2014).

The Impact on Cis Black Women and Cis Black Men:

Trans women and trans men of color face compounded discrimination due to both their gender identity and race. Their advocacy efforts can bring attention to the unique challenges faced by cis Black women and cis Black men, fostering solidarity and intersectional understanding. However, these efforts can also unintentionally overshadow the specific struggles of cis-Black individuals, particularly in areas such as racial discrimination and socio-economic inequality.

Real-Life Example: Black trans women have been at the forefront of the fight for LGBTQ rights, but they also face higher levels of violence and discrimination compared to their white counterparts. This highlights the need for intersectional advocacy that addresses both racial and gender-based oppression (The Conversation, 2022).

Analytical Inference: The efforts of trans women and trans men can lead to significant progress in challenging traditional gender norms and advocating for inclusivity. However, these efforts can also create tensions and complexities within the broader social justice landscape. For cis white women and cis white men, this means navigating evolving gender dynamics and expanding definitions of identity. For cis Black women and cis Black men, this means addressing compounded discrimination and ensuring that their unique struggles are not overshadowed. In the future, fostering inclusive advocacy that acknowledges and addresses the intersectionality of gender and race is crucial for achieving true equality and justice for all individuals.

Point 13: Integrating the Efforts of Trans Women and Trans Men with the Progress of Cisgendered Individuals

The efforts of trans women and trans men in advocating for their rights and visibility have significant implications for the progress of cisgender individuals, including cis white women, cis white men, cis Black women, and cis Black men. Integrating these efforts is essential for creating a more inclusive and equitable social justice movement that acknowledges and addresses the unique challenges faced by all individuals.

The Benefits of Integration:

Integrating the efforts of trans women and trans men with those of cisgender individuals can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of gender and identity. This integration can foster solidarity and collaboration, allowing for a more unified approach to addressing systemic inequalities and advocating for social justice.

Real-Life Example: The collaboration between trans activists and cisgender feminists in the fight for reproductive rights highlights the benefits of integration. By working together, these groups can address the unique challenges faced by trans individuals while also advocating for broader reproductive justice (Everyday Feminism, 2014).

The Challenges of Integration:

While integration offers significant benefits, it also presents challenges. Cisgender individuals may need to confront their own biases and assumptions about gender and identity, and trans individuals may need to navigate spaces that have historically excluded them. Addressing these challenges requires open dialogue, mutual respect, and a commitment to intersectional advocacy.

Real-Life Example: The inclusion of trans women in women's shelters has sparked debates about safety and inclusivity. While some argue that trans women should have access to these spaces, others believe it may create safety concerns. This debate highlights the need for thoughtful and inclusive policies that address the concerns of all individuals involved (The Conversation, 2022).

Analytical Inference: Integrating the efforts of trans women and trans men with those of cisgender individuals can lead to a more inclusive and equitable social justice movement. This integration requires open dialogue, mutual respect, and a commitment to intersectional advocacy. For cis white women and cis white men, this means confronting biases and expanding their understanding of gender and identity. For cis Black women and cis Black men, this means addressing compounded discrimination and ensuring that their unique struggles are acknowledged and addressed. In the future, fostering inclusive advocacy that integrates the efforts of all individuals is crucial for achieving true equality and justice.

Statistics and Evidence:

Statistics further illustrate the disparities created by these manipulations:

  1. Promotion Disparities: A study from MIT Sloan found that women received higher performance ratings than male employees but received 8.3% lower ratings for potential than men. As a result, female employees were 14% less likely to be promoted than their male colleagues (Castilla & Benard, 2010, p. 543). According to McKinsey & Company, for every 100 men who got promoted to a managerial role, only 85 women advanced to the same position. This gap was even larger for women of color, with only 71 Latinas and 58 Black women receiving a promotion (McKinsey & Company, 2022). The Global Gender Gap Report 2022 by the World Economic Forum shows that women's share of senior and leadership roles has been increasing, but significant disparities remain. In 2022, women held only 31% of leadership roles globally, with even lower representation in industries like Energy (20%), Manufacturing (19%), and Infrastructure (16%) (World Economic Forum, 2022).

  2. Women's March Inclusivity: The Women's March on Washington in 2017 faced criticism for its lack of inclusivity and representation of women of color. Many women of color felt that their voices and issues were not adequately represented, highlighting the ongoing struggle for intersectionality within feminist movements. According to an analysis, the march drew over 470,000 people in Washington, D.C., and between 3.3 million and 5.2 million people participated in the marches in the U.S. (Wikipedia, 2017). Critics said the 2017 Women's March centered on cis white women at the expense of women of color and trans women. Many felt that their issues, such as racism, discrimination, police brutality, LGBTQ inclusivity, and immigration, were relegated in favor of issues that matter most to straight, white, middle-class women (USA Today, 2017).

  3. Trans Women and Trans Men in Feminist Movements: The inclusion of trans women and trans men in feminist movements has sparked significant debate. Trans individuals often face unique challenges that intersect with those of cisgender women, but their experiences can also differ significantly. The inclusion of trans individuals in feminist movements can bring attention to issues such as gender identity and transphobia, which are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of gender equality. However, some argue that the focus on trans issues can sometimes overshadow the specific struggles faced by cisgender women, particularly in areas such as reproductive rights and workplace discrimination (Everyday Feminism, 2014).

  4. White Men's Influence: White men continue to hold significant power in decisions affecting all women, including trans women and trans men. This power dynamic is evident in areas such as reproductive rights, where male-dominated legislatures often make decisions that impact women's bodies and autonomy. The influence of white men in these decisions can perpetuate systemic inequalities and hinder progress towards gender equality. For example, in the U.S., white men hold 62% of elected offices despite representing only 30% of the population (Newsweek, 2023). The criminalization of women's bodies, particularly through anti-abortion laws, is a clear example of how white men exert control over women's reproductive rights. In 2019, 25 white men in Alabama passed a draconian anti-abortion law, highlighting the ongoing struggle for women's autonomy (Penny, 2019).

Analytical Inference: The statistics and evidence provided highlight the ongoing challenges and disparities faced by women, particularly women of color and trans individuals, in their quest for equality. These disparities are perpetuated by systemic structures and power dynamics that favor white men and, to a lesser extent, white women. The following analytical inferences can be drawn from the statistics and evidence:

  1. Promotion Disparities: The promotion disparities between men and women, particularly women of color, underscore the systemic biases that exist within organizational structures. Despite receiving higher performance ratings, women are less likely to be promoted, highlighting the need for organizations to address these biases and create equitable opportunities for all employees. For white women, this means navigating a system that still favors men, while for Black women, the barriers to advancement are even greater. Addressing these disparities is crucial for creating a more inclusive and equitable workplace.

  2. Women's March Inclusivity: The criticism faced by the Women's March on Washington in 2017 for its lack of inclusivity and representation of women of color highlights the ongoing struggle for intersectionality within feminist movements. The exclusion of women of color and trans women from these movements perpetuates a narrow and exclusionary vision of feminism. For white women, this means recognizing and addressing their privilege and biases, while for Black women and trans women, it means advocating for a more inclusive and intersectional approach to feminism.

  3. Trans Women and Trans Men in Feminist Movements: The inclusion of trans women and trans men in feminist movements brings valuable perspectives and highlights the importance of addressing gender identity and transphobia. However, it also requires a nuanced understanding of how different forms of oppression intersect, particularly for trans individuals who face compounded discrimination. For cis white women and cis white men, this means confronting biases and expanding their understanding of gender and identity. For cis Black women and cis Black men, this means addressing compounded discrimination and ensuring that their unique struggles are acknowledged and addressed.

  4. White Men's Influence: The significant power held by white men in decisions affecting all women, including trans women and trans men, perpetuates systemic inequalities and hinders progress towards gender equality. The criminalization of women's bodies through anti-abortion laws and the overrepresentation of white men in elected offices are clear examples of how white men exert control over women's rights and autonomy. Addressing these power dynamics is crucial for creating a more equitable society where all individuals, regardless of gender or race, have equal opportunities and rights.

Conclusion:

The manipulation of feminism, racism, socio-economics, and sexuality by white women to gain equality with white men is a multifaceted issue that requires a nuanced understanding of intersectionality. By centering their own experiences and leveraging their racial and sexual privilege, white women have often advanced their own interests at the expense of broader social justice goals. Addressing these dynamics is crucial for creating a more inclusive and equitable gender-neutral movement, rather than a one-sided gender movement. The dangers of what we may not be able to see and the profundity of how the world gravitates toward white women more so than Black women highlight the urgent need for a deeper examination of these issues to ensure true equality for all women.

Furthermore, the inclusion of trans women and trans men in feminist movements adds another layer of complexity, as their unique challenges and experiences must be acknowledged and addressed. Trans individuals, particularly trans women of color, face compounded discrimination that requires a nuanced and intersectional approach. Additionally, the power dynamics involving white men continue to influence decisions affecting all women, perpetuating systemic inequalities and hindering progress toward gender equality.

In conclusion, creating a truly inclusive and equitable feminist movement requires a comprehensive understanding of the interconnected nature of race, gender, class, and sexuality. By addressing these dynamics and supporting innovations that combat systemic inequality, we can work towards a future where all women, regardless of their background or identity, can achieve true equality and justice. Integrating the efforts of trans women and trans men with those of cisgender individuals is essential for fostering solidarity and collaboration, ensuring that all voices and experiences are represented and acknowledged in the fight for social justice.

Works Cited:

  • Adams, Carol J. The Sexual Politics of Meat. Continuum, 1990.

  • Burke, Tarana. "The #MeToo Movement." The New York Times, 2018, p. 56.

  • Castilla, Emilio J., and Stephen Benard. "The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations." Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 55, no. 4, 2010, pp. 543-676.

  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé. "Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics." University of Chicago Legal Forum, vol. 1989, no. 1, 1989, pp. 139-167.

  • de Beauvoir, Simone. The Second Sex. Vintage Books, 1949.

  • DiAngelo, Robin. White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism. Beacon Press, 2018.

  • Dupere, Katie. "16 Brilliant Innovations Tackling Poverty Around the World." Mashable, 2023, p. 45.

  • Garcia, Sandra E. "The Women's March on Washington: A Critique of Inclusivity." The Washington Post, 2017, p. 34.

  • hooks, bell. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. South End Press, 1984.

  • Jenkins, John Philip. "White Supremacy." Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2024, p. 112.

  • Kagan, Julia. "Glass Cliff: Definition, Research, Examples, Vs. Glass Ceiling." Investopedia, 2022, p. 89.

  • McIntosh, Peggy. "White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack." Peace and Freedom Magazine, July/August 1989, pp. 10-12.

  • McKinsey & Company. "Women in the Workplace 2022." McKinsey & Company, 2022.

  • Oluo, Ijeoma. Mediocre: The Dangerous Legacy of White Male America. Seal Press, 2020, pp. 45, 67.

  • Penny, Laurie. "The Criminalization of Women’s Bodies Is All About Conservative Male Power." The New Republic, 2019.

  • Ryan, Michelle K., and S. Alexander Haslam. "The Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Over-Represented in Precarious Leadership Positions." British Journal of Management, vol. 16, no. 2, 2005, pp. 81-90.

  • The Conversation. "Transgender People of Color Face Unique Challenges as Gender Discrimination and Racism Intersect." The Conversation, 2022.

  • U.S. Census Bureau. "Income and Poverty in the United States: 2023." U.S. Government Printing Office, 2023, p. 45.

  • USA Today. "Critics Say Women's March Ignores Women of Color." USA Today, 2017.

  • Wikipedia. "2017 Women's March." Wikipedia, 2017.

  • World Economic Forum. "Global Gender Gap Report 2022." World Economic Forum, 2022.

  • World Economic Forum. "Global Gender Gap Report 2024." World Economic Forum, 2024.

  • Everyday Feminism. "The Inclusion of Trans Women in Feminist Movements." Everyday Feminism, 2014.

  • Newsweek. "White Men Hold 62% of Elected Offices Despite Representing Only 30% of the Population." Newsweek, 2023.

Back to blog

Leave a comment